Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

 

Pentagon Sees Protests as “Low Level Terrorism”

SignsAntiterrorism training materials used by the Department of Defense teach that public protests should be regarded as “low level terrorism,” according to a letter of complaint sent to the department today by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.

“Teaching employees that dissent on issues of public concern is something to be feared, rather than encouraged, is a dangerously counterproductive use of scarce security resources, making us less safe as a democracy,” Northern California ACLU Staff Attorney Ann Brick and ACLU Washington National Security Policy Council Michael German wrote in the letter to Gail McGinn, Acting Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.

“DoD employees cannot accomplish their mission of protecting our nation and its values unless they understand that those values encompass the right to criticize our government through protest activities,” they wrote.  “It is imperative that they are taught the difference between political, religious or social activism and terrorism.”

Among the multiple-choice questions included in its Level 1 Antiterrorism Awareness training course – an annual training requirement for all DoD personnel that is fulfilled through web-based instruction – the DoD asks the following: “Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorist activity?”  To answer correctly, the examinee must select “protests.”  The ACLU wants that changed immediately, and wants corrective information sent to all DoD employees who received the training.

http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2009/06/10/defense-department-sees-protests-as-terrorism/

Creative Commons License photo credit: Remixer96

Posted by admin on June 16th, 2009 No Comments

1 in 7 Scientists Said to be Faking Data

Faking scientific data and failing to report commercial conflicts of interest are far more prevalent than previously thought, a study suggests.

One in seven scientists says that they are aware of colleagues having seriously breached acceptable conduct by inventing results.  And around 46 per cent say that they have observed fellow scientists engage in “questionable practices”, such as presenting data selectively or changing the conclusions of a study in response to pressure from a funding source.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6425036.ece

Posted by admin on June 4th, 2009 No Comments